* Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [190908 11:16]:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 17:02:45 +0200
> Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 05:58:22PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > > The TI PWMSS driver is a simple bus driver for providing power
> > > power management for the PWM peripherals on TI AM33xx SoCs, namely
> > > eCAP, eHRPWM and eQEP. The eQEP is a counter rather than a PWM, so
> > > it does not make sense to have the bus driver in the PWM subsystem
> > > since the PWMSS is not exclusive to PWM devices.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v3 changes:
> > > - none
> > > v2 changes:
> > > - new patch
> > >
> > > drivers/bus/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
> > > drivers/bus/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/{pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c => bus/ti-pwmss.c} | 0
> > > drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 ---------
> > > drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 -
> > > 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > rename drivers/{pwm/pwm-tipwmss.c => bus/ti-pwmss.c} (100%)
> >
> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Do we need an immutable branch for these precursor patches to the
> driver addition? It's not going to make 5.4 via my tree as cutting it
> too fine so we'll be in the position of holding these in a non obvious
> tree for a whole cycle.
Sure an immutable branch would be nice in case of unlikely
dts file conflicts. And yeah no need to try to rush to v5.4.
Regards,
Tony
