> On Jul 17, 2019, at 3:12 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:28:37PM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 03:55:15PM +0100, jic23@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Not exactly standard license text, but clear in intent and it's >>> my copyright anyway. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/iio/trigger/iio-trig-loop.c | 3 +-- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/trigger/iio-trig-loop.c b/drivers/iio/trigger/iio-trig-loop.c >>> index 9258d3cf149b..f0205a9e47d0 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/iio/trigger/iio-trig-loop.c >>> +++ b/drivers/iio/trigger/iio-trig-loop.c >>> @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ >>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> >> I think it should be: >> >> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only >> >> https://spdx.org/licenses/ >> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html >> >> I don't know if `spdxcheck.py` points out about >> such a mismatch. >> >> Yes, documentation and sanity checkers needs to be updated. >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wipjStEwJj2_iWxBdVC4oV8rY5NjrRb1tmWLUa0VrS_Eg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Please read the in-kernel documentation about this. We support both > types of tags now and have done so since the beginning. > > While I understand that the previous SPDX License List and current version identifiers are supported here, it would be really helpful more generally if we could use the current ones now and going forward. Thanks, Jilayne SPDX legal team co-lead
