Hi, > I think I2C ecosystem is also part interested in I3C due the > compatibility and maybe they can provide some feedback. > If you think differently, sorry I will remove I2C list next time. No worries, but please do remove next time, for two reasons: a) even for I2C clients, the i2c-list is usually not added if the client only uses standard I2C communication. If there is something which needw special attention, OK. But most of the time, the list is for the I2C core and bus master drivers, and not clients. (That might be different for I3C, though...) b) if the patch in question is "self-contained" in the I3C world and not affecting I2C, I think there is no need to add I2C. Interested parties can subscribe to the I3C list. Yes, that was a good occasion to write this publicly. Thanks, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
