Hi Jonathan
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 6:12 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:04:31 +0100
> Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan
> >
> > Very old thread. I have created Giotto Tune based on this design and
> > now try to attach to ds1807. I have done some hack on the current
> > interface to have it working in alsa. I have some trouble with the API
> >
> > fragment@3 {
> > target = <&sound>;
> > __overlay__ {
> > compatible = "bcm2708,bcm2708-audio-giotto";
> > i2s-controller = <&i2s>;
> > io-channels = <&volume 0>;
>
> This is a list, not just one.
with the driver I have tried <&volume 1> <&volume 0>;
>
> > #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> > nreset = <&gpio 5 1>;
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> > };
> >
> > fragment@4 {
> > target = <&spidev0>;
> > __overlay__ {
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> > };
> >
> > fragment@5 {
> > target = <&i2c1>;
> > __overlay__ {
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > volume: ds1807@1 {
> > compatible = "maxim,ds1807";
> > reg = <0x28>;
> > status = "okay";
> > #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> > };
> > };
> > };
> >
> > This is the overlay and this is the change of the API
> >
> > -static int iio_channel_write(struct iio_channel *chan, int val, int val2,
> > +static int iio_channel_write(struct iio_channel *chan, int index, int
> > val, int val2,
> > enum iio_chan_info_enum info)
> > {
> > return chan->indio_dev->info->write_raw(chan->indio_dev,
> > - chan->channel, val, val2, info);
> > + &chan->channel[index],
> > val, val2, info);
> > }
> >
> > +int iio_write_channel_attribute(struct iio_channel *chan, int index,
> > int val, int val2,
> > + enum iio_chan_info_enum attribute)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&chan->indio_dev->info_exist_lock);
> > + if (chan->indio_dev->info == NULL) {
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto err_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (index < 0 || index > chan->indio_dev->num_channels)
You mean that num_channels is taken in account when you request each of us.
Can one channel has multiple raw output?
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret = iio_channel_write(chan, index, val, val2, attribute);
> > +err_unlock:
> > + mutex_unlock(&chan->indio_dev->info_exist_lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_write_channel_attribute);
> >
> > I order to trigger both controls
> >
> > + ret = iio_write_channel_attribute(&data->iio_ch[0], 0,
> > + val, 0,
> > + IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = iio_write_channel_attribute(&data->iio_ch[0], 1,
> > + val, 0,
> > + IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> >
> > The problem is that we can have one iio_dev and multiple raw value for
> > each one.
>
> Absolutely we can, but you need to register multiple channels and get them
> all, not just one and then try and build off that.
Ok I need to check back again
>
> > Is this the correct way?
>
> No. You need to have multiple channels listed, not just the one.
>
> There are examples in Documentation/bindings/iio/iio-bindings.txt
>
I have followed it but not with expected result. I will try to go in a
mainline kernel
Michael
> I may be misunderstanding what you are trying to do.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 2:10 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
> > <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 12 May 2018 11:50:23 +0200
> > > > Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> > On Wed, 9 May 2018 11:19:51 +0200
> > > >> > Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Hi Jonathan
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
> > > >> >> <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >> > Hi
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> On Mon, 7 May 2018 18:55:16 +0200
> > > >> >> >> Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>> On 05/07/2018 06:44 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > > >> >> >>> > On 05/06/2018 07:37 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > >> >> >>> >> On Sun, 6 May 2018 15:30:47 +0200
> > > >> >> >>> >> Michael Trimarchi <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>> >>
> > > >> >> >>> >>> The following functions are supported:
> > > >> >> >>> >>> - write, read potentiometer value
> > > >> >> >>> >>>
> > > >> >> >>> >>> Value are exported in DBm because it's used as an audio
> > > >> >> >>> >>> attenuator
> > > >> >> >>> >>
> > > >> >> >>> >> This is interesting. The problem is that there is no way for
> > > >> >> >>> >> userspace to know that it is reporting in DBm rather than
> > > >> >> >>> >> reporting a linear gain or a straight forward resistance.
> > > >> >> >>> >>
> > > >> >> >>> >> This is rather closer in operation to the analog front end
> > > >> >> >>> >> driver I took the other day than to the other potentiometers
> > > >> >> >>> >> we have drivers for.
> > > >> >> >>> >>
> > > >> >> >>> >> Anyhow, how to solve this? Two options come to mind.
> > > >> >> >>> >> 1) Look up table mapping to linear gain as per current ABI
> > > >> >> >>> >> 2) Add a new channel type to represent the fact we are
> > > >> >> >>> >> looking at a logarithmic value, letting us handle it as DB.
> > > >> >> >>> >
> > > >> >> >>> > Yeah, I guess it is a bit difficult. I don't think this should be a separate
> > > >> >> >>> > type since we are still describing the same thing, just the scale is
> > > >> >> >>> > logarithmic rather than linear. Translation table doesn't work either since
> > > >> >> >>> > your values would get ridiculous small/large. We could add a db suffix to
> > > >> >> >>> > the type, but that's just terrible. I guess the best we can do is have a
> > > >> >> >>> > scale attribute that says 1dB.
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> >>> The other problem of course is that dB is a relative unit. The ratio of one
> > > >> >> >>> value to another. Whereas our normal scale refers to an absolute value.
> > > >> >> >> I'm really not keen on this. We have done the separate types
> > > >> >> >> for humidity already, where we had relative (which is a ratio) and absolute
> > > >> >> >> (which isn't). It's not pretty though.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> Potentially we could define a new attribute that says this one is
> > > >> >> >> is db or linear but that's ugly too.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> As you asked, are we looking at a part that gets used for anything other
> > > >> >> >> than audio or not? If just audio, alsa driver does indeed make more sense.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > This can be used in audio but even in other field. It's just a potentiometer.
> > > >> >> > Can I know what is wrong to use the same approch of audio ampliefier that we
> > > >> >> > have already in the iio tree?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:device1/out_altvoltage0_hardwaregain
> > > >> >> -10.000000 dB
> > > >> >> echo -10 > /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:device1/out_altvoltage0_hardwaregain
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Wow, somehow that entire thing had slipped my mind. I guess we went
> > > >> > through the whole question of how to support dB scales years ago
> > > >> > and it has just been very little used.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hmm. Sorry for my absent mindedness! Anyhow, there are a few additional
> > > >> > comments that need cleaning up.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > It is going to be a little odd as the only potentiometer (I think) that
> > > >> > is acting as a scale free attenuator, rather that being controlled on the basis
> > > >> > of resistance, but for the part that seems to make sense so fair enough.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm slightly curious to know what you have this wired up to though?
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm design GIOTTO ;) an audio module that use those to control the
> > > >> volume. It's a dsd
> > > >> native sound card that demultiplex i2s to L and R dsd on a pcm1795a.
> > > >> Everything already
> > > >> run under linux. The idea is to create an audio card and connect iio
> > > >> device to the volume
> > > >> to change dsd volume
> > > >>
> > > >> > Are the inputs and outputs invisible to the kernel or is this feeding
> > > >> > into another device?
> > > >>
> > > >> I think a reply above. Anyway we don't want to have driver duplication
> > > >> and I think should be land
> > > >> there
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > If we are feeding another device then the work recently done on a
> > > >> > generic AFE driver may be useful. At somepoint we'll need a version
> > > >>
> > > >> Can you point to it? I need to read about ;)
> > > >
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10358131/
> > > >
> > > > Should be in linux-next by now ready for the next merge window.
> > > > As it turns out, probably not relevant in your case you will
> > > > probably want to have the sound card as a consumer so that
> > > > the volume control maps nicely via usual interface etc.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps cc the relevant sound lists and maintainers on next version.
> > > > I don't want to tread on anyone's toes if they are of the view that
> > > > it shouldn't be done this way (should be fine from previous conversations
> > > > with a few of them!)
> > >
> > > Yes it's a good idea. I will try but I need to move my development
> > > board on latest
> > > kernel.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Jonathan
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Michael
> > > >>
> > > >> > of that which deals with standalone amplifiers and attenuators anyway,
> > > >> > but I don't know if it is useful to you.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Jonathan
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Jonathan
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> uname -a
> > > >> >> Linux linaro-alip 4.4.93 #7 SMP Sun May 6 13:23:08 CEST 2018 armv7l GNU/Linux
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Michael
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > Michael
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> Jonathan
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > --
> > > >> >> > | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV |
> > > >> >> > | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 |
> > > >> >> > | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL |
> > > >> >> > | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com |
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > | Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV |
> > > | COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 |
> > > | +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL |
> > > | [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com |
> >
> >
> >
>
--
| Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV |
| COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 |
| +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL |
| [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com |
