On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 08:58:19AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 07:19:16PM +0100, Tomasz Duszynski wrote:
> > Add device tree support for Plantower PMS7003 particulate matter sensor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../iio/chemical/plantower,pms7003.txt | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/chemical/plantower,pms7003.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/chemical/plantower,pms7003.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/chemical/plantower,pms7003.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..e4c7f2fb1e30
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/chemical/plantower,pms7003.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > +* Plantower PMS7003 particulate matter sensor
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: must be "plantower,pms7003"
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- vcc-supply: phandle to the regulator that provides power to the sensor
>
> Shouldn't this one be a required property?
>
Driver does not use regulator framework hence to me this property fits
here better.
> > +- set-gpios: phandle to the GPIO connected to the SET line
> > +- reset-gpios: phandle to the GPIO connected to the RESET line
> > +
> > +Refer to serial/slave-device.txt for generic serial attached device bindings.
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > +&uart0 {
> > + pms7003 {
>
> The node name should be generic and reflect the functionality rather
> than model. Perhaps "pms" will do here.
>
Agree, ideally we should have a generic dt name for this kind of sensors
(something like air-pollution-sensor perhaps?). But unfortunately there isn't
anything available now so I guess compatible part name should be okay
(besides this is the type of naming commonly used in other iio bindings).
> > + compatible = "plantower,pms7003";
> > + };
> > +};
>
> Johan
