On 1/26/19 12:19 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:04:29 -0800
Martin Kelly <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Martin Kelly <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
We have added an optional boolean property for configuring a BMI160
interrupt pin as open-drain, as opposed to the default push-pull, so
document this.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bmi160.txt | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bmi160.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bmi160.txt
index 1aec19997fb5..7eb4b6016404 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bmi160.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bmi160.txt
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ Optional properties:
- interrupts : interrupt mapping for IRQ
- interrupt-names : set to "INT1" if INT1 pin should be used as interrupt
input, set to "INT2" if INT2 pin should be used instead
+- bmi160,open-drain : set if the specified interrupt pin should be configured as
+ open drain. If not set, defaults to push-pull.
I missed this before, but normally we prefix with a manufacturer rather than
a particular part number. Maybe that changed when I wasn't looking though!
Anyhow, these DT binding changes all need devicetree maintainer reviews as they
aren't totally trivial.
Yep, devicetree is on this thread. Rob, should I prefix with device name
("bmi160") or manufacturer ("bosch")?
Thanks,
Jonathan
Examples: