Hi,
On 1/12/19 4:42 AM, Himanshu Jha wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Sebastien Bourdelin wrote:
This commit allow the driver to work with device-tree.
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
I get the following compilation failure:
Below I have `allyesconfig` except 'BME680' configure as [M]
in case you wish to reproduce.
himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ grep -i -w 'CONFIG_BME680\|CONFIG_ACPI\|CONFIG_OF' .config
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_OF=y
CONFIG_BME680=m
himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ sudo make drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
DESCEND objtool
CC [M] drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
In file included from ./include/linux/acpi.h:41:0,
from drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.c:7:
./include/linux/module.h:213:1: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘extern’
extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
^
drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.c:119:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE’
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bme680_of_spi_match);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
scripts/Makefile.build:291: recipe for target 'drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o] Error 1
Makefile:1741: recipe for target 'drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o' failed
make: *** [drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o] Error 2
Thanks for the test, this is bad, i will fix that!
BUT if:
himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ make allyesconfig
scripts/kconfig/conf --allyesconfig Kconfig
#
# configuration written to .config
#
himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ sudo make drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
scripts/kconfig/conf --syncconfig Kconfig
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o
LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c
YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.h
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o
YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.c
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o
HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc
CC scripts/mod/empty.o
MKELF scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
HOSTCC scripts/mod/modpost.o
CC scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s
HOSTCC scripts/mod/file2alias.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o
HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost
CC kernel/bounds.s
CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
DESCEND objtool
CC drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
Compiles without any issues.
Hum, weird it compiles actually :s
Also, wondering when is 0x77 i2c address used, since I tested
this on 3 different boards with 0x76(when SDO is connected to GND)
And why do I connect SDO to ground everytime ?
It is because if SDO pin is left floating then I2C address will be
undefined as said in datasheet + I have observed this while testing.
Ah, thanks for the reminder, actually i have only tested with a floating
SDO, but i will probably use the GND instead even if i didn't had any
problem right now.
Actallly, I don't understand what "VDIDO" is, as explained in the
datasheet.
Anyway, if the above compilation issue is not a problem, then
Acked-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
