Le mar. 8 janv. 2019 à 01:46, William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Patrick Havelange wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm in the process of adding a new IIO/counter driver, however I also saw > > that there was a work in progress to have a separate counter subsystem ( > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=153974167727206 ). But it seems there is > > no recent progress on it. > > What is the state of those patches ? Is it still interesting to develop the > > driver as an IIO/counter , or should I use already that new subsystem ? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Patrick Havelange. > > Hello, > > I am still open to merging this patchset and maintaining the Counter > subsystem. However, I took the lack of response for my latest > submission to indicate a loss of interest in this patchset's approach. > If there are still people who want this, I can rebase and resend this > patchset for submission; the past few versions have primarily been code > clarity and documentation changes so I believe the core design itself is > somewhat stable now. > > Just let me know how best to proceed and I shall be happy to oblige -- > whether to continue maintaining this patchset or to drop this design in > favor of improving the existing IIO Counter code in the kernel. > > I'll CC those from the patchset submission to keep them in the loop. I confirm that I still interested to get those patches merged. Regards, Benjamin > > Sincerely, > > William Breathitt Gray > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- Benjamin Gaignard Graphic Study Group Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
