On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:47:02 -0700
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add ADC5_AMUX_THM2_100K_PU and ADC5_AMUX_THM4_100K_PU to the list of
> rev2 ADC channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
This is fine and applied to the togreg branch of iio.git.
Pushed out as testing to let the autobuilders play with it.
However, I took a quick look and can't immediately see what prevents us
specifying channels in DT that don't have these definitions in the driver.
Should we have a check for that as at least superficially it seems like
a bad idea!
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c
> index a4299417f3de..1f9298a5c83d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c
> @@ -491,8 +491,12 @@ static const struct adc5_channels adc5_chans_rev2[ADC5_MAX_CHANNEL] = {
> SCALE_HW_CALIB_PMIC_THERM)
> [ADC5_AMUX_THM1_100K_PU] = ADC5_CHAN_TEMP("amux_thm1_100k_pu", 1,
> SCALE_HW_CALIB_THERM_100K_PULLUP)
> + [ADC5_AMUX_THM2_100K_PU] = ADC5_CHAN_TEMP("amux_thm2_100k_pu", 1,
> + SCALE_HW_CALIB_THERM_100K_PULLUP)
> [ADC5_AMUX_THM3_100K_PU] = ADC5_CHAN_TEMP("amux_thm3_100k_pu", 1,
> SCALE_HW_CALIB_THERM_100K_PULLUP)
> + [ADC5_AMUX_THM4_100K_PU] = ADC5_CHAN_TEMP("amux_thm4_100k_pu", 1,
> + SCALE_HW_CALIB_THERM_100K_PULLUP)
> [ADC5_AMUX_THM5_100K_PU] = ADC5_CHAN_TEMP("amux_thm5_100k_pu", 1,
> SCALE_HW_CALIB_THERM_100K_PULLUP)
> [ADC5_XO_THERM_100K_PU] = ADC5_CHAN_TEMP("xo_therm_100k_pu", 1,
