On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:26:10 -0400 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Also, many many drivers deal with signals-as-an-electrical-thing - is > >it appropriate for this particular driver to take that namespace? > > In the context of the Generic Counter paradigm, a "Signal" is an > abstraction for the stream of data that is fed to the counter device for > evaluation (triggering updates for the readable "Count"). In many cases > a "Signal" correlates with a physical electrical line (for example the A > and B electrical lines for a quadrature encoder), but this isn't a hard > requirement as the paradigm permits more abstract data streams. > > I decided on "Signal" to match the naming convention that appears in the > datasheets of many counter devices, but "Line" may be a decent > alternative name we could use to indicate a counter device input data > stream. > > I'd like to get some other opinions as well before I make a naming > change to "Signal" -- whether to stay with "Signal," switch to "Line," or > rename to something else. For what it's worth, I think it's unlikely for > a counter device driver author to confuse a Counter Signal with the > Linux OS signal within the context of the Generic Counter paradigm and > their respective counter device datasheet. gc_signal_* would be better. That retains "signal", but makes it clear that the symbols belong to generic counter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
