On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:21:21 -0400 Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This would otherwise lead supply 7 and 8 to scale to 3V instead of > 6V > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@xxxxxxxxx> Interesting... Driver isn't in mainline though and as far as I know hasn't been submitted. Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c > index fd4eb6d..6b3ab56 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c > @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ static int ams_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > case AMS_SUPPLY7: > case AMS_SUPPLY8: > *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_6VOLT; > + break; > case AMS_SUPPLY9: > case AMS_SUPPLY10: > if (chan->scan_index < PS_SEQ_MAX) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
