On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 16:32 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-04-21 16:23, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 18:43 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > > [...] > >> +int mux_chip_register(struct mux_chip *mux_chip) > >> +{ > >> + int i; > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + for (i = 0; i < mux_chip->controllers; ++i) { > >> + struct mux_control *mux = &mux_chip->mux[i]; > >> + > >> + if (mux->idle_state == mux->cached_state) > >> + continue; > > > > I think this should be changed to > > > > - if (mux->idle_state == mux->cached_state) > > + if (mux->idle_state == mux->cached_state || > > + mux->idle_state == MUX_IDLE_AS_IS) > > continue; > > > > or the following mux_control_set will be called with state == > > MUX_IDLE_AS_IS. Alternatively, mux_control_set should return when passed > > this value. > > That cannot happen because ->cached_state is initialized to -1 > in mux_chip_alloc, so should always be == MUX_IDLE_AS_IS when > registering. And drivers are not supposed to touch ->cached_state. > I.e., ->cached_state is "owned" by the core. So this was caused by me filling cached_state from register reads in the mmio driver. Makes me wonder why I am not allowed to do this, though, if I am able to read back the initial state? regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html