Re: [RFC/PATCH v3] staging: iio: update locking method during frequency writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/03/17 19:25, Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:22:49PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 30/03/17 10:33, Gargi Sharma wrote:
>>> The driver needs to insure atomicity during frequency
>>> changes of bus and device. The iiodev->mlock as used
>>> was not doing that. Replace it with the drivers existing
>>> buffer lock and introduce an auxiliary spi_write() that does
>>> not hold the lock.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Only one comment on this.  Why an RFC?  I nearly
>> ignored this in my sweep of easy patches to pick up
>> this evening purely because I thought there might still
>> be something that needed real thought in it.
> 
> Oh, that was my bad influence!
> We were reviewing proposals for these in Outreachy and I'd
> suggested the RFC label for the proposals.  Thanks for
> addressing it.
> alisons
Was fair enough for round one - though saying why it might
need comments in the patch description is always good.

By V3 with all positive comments, probably fine to loose the
RFC :)
> 
>>
>> It's a clean nice patch that I don't think any substantial
>> questions have been raised against - so just submit it as
>> patch. As an RFC it is underselling itself!
>>
>> Anyhow, never mind, I did look and have applied it ;)
>>
>> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out
>> as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jonathan
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>>         - Removed unnecessary ret variable inside
>>>           __ade7754_spi_write_reg_8 function.
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>         - Added auxiliary function.
>>>         - Updated the buf_lock comment appropriately.
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
>>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c
>>> index c8d2d4c..91f8740 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c
>>> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
>>>  /**
>>>   * struct ade7754_state - device instance specific data
>>>   * @us:			actual spi_device
>>> - * @buf_lock:		mutex to protect tx and rx
>>> + * @buf_lock:		mutex to protect tx, rx and write frequency
>>>   * @tx:			transmit buffer
>>>   * @rx:			receive buffer
>>>   **/
>>> @@ -108,17 +108,25 @@ struct ade7754_state {
>>>  	u8			rx[ADE7754_MAX_RX];
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> -static int ade7754_spi_write_reg_8(struct device *dev, u8 reg_address, u8 val)
>>> +/* Unlocked version of ade7754_spi_write_reg_8 function */
>>> +static int __ade7754_spi_write_reg_8(struct device *dev, u8 reg_address, u8 val)
>>>  {
>>> -	int ret;
>>>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
>>>  	struct ade7754_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>  
>>> -	mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
>>>  	st->tx[0] = ADE7754_WRITE_REG(reg_address);
>>>  	st->tx[1] = val;
>>> +	return spi_write(st->us, st->tx, 2);
>>> +}
>>>  
>>> -	ret = spi_write(st->us, st->tx, 2);
>>> +static int ade7754_spi_write_reg_8(struct device *dev, u8 reg_address, u8 val)
>>> +{
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
>>> +	struct ade7754_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
>>> +	ret = __ade7754_spi_write_reg_8(dev, reg_address, val);
>>>  	mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
>>>  
>>>  	return ret;
>>> @@ -513,7 +521,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7754_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
>>>  	if (!val)
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  
>>> -	mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>> +	mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
>>>  
>>>  	t = 26000 / val;
>>>  	if (t > 0)
>>> @@ -531,10 +539,10 @@ static ssize_t ade7754_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
>>>  	reg &= ~(3 << 3);
>>>  	reg |= t << 3;
>>>  
>>> -	ret = ade7754_spi_write_reg_8(dev, ADE7754_WAVMODE, reg);
>>> +	ret = __ade7754_spi_write_reg_8(dev, ADE7754_WAVMODE, reg);
>>>  
>>>  out:
>>> -	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
>>>  
>>>  	return ret ? ret : len;
>>>  }
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux