On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 23/03/2017 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>>> P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers. >>>> Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though. >>> >>> I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner, >>> as you will not end up with a long list. >> >> I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though, >> like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc.. >> But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax. >> > > Hum. I don't really understand what you are saying.. Am I supposed to > modify something or, is it okay and we're waiting for Lee to apply on > his tree? > > Thanks in advance for clearing it up, > > Quentin I'm just mentioning some follow up tasks I want to do. The patch is fine and we're waiting for Lee to take it. ChenYu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
