On 21/03/17 19:52, Gargi Sharma wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 20/03/17 07:39, Gargi Sharma wrote:
>>> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
>>> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
>>> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
>>>
>>> In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware state
>>> changes. Replace it with buf_lock in the devices global data.
>>>
>>> As buf_lock already protects operations in ade7754_write_frequency,
>>> there isn't a need to acquire the lock inside ade7754_spi_write_reg_8
>>> when writing to the register.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gargi Sharma <gs051095@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Question inline.
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c
>>> index 024463a..eb03469 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7754.c
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,15 @@ static int ade7754_spi_write_reg_8(struct device *dev, u8 reg_address, u8 val)
>>> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
>>> struct ade7754_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>
>>> + if (reg_address == ADE7754_WAVMODE) {
>>> + st->tx[0] = ADE7754_WRITE_REG(reg_address);
>>> + st->tx[1] = val;
>>> +
>>> + ret = spi_write(st->us, st->tx, 2);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>
>> This block doesn't fit with the description. What's going on here?
>
> When the function ade_spi_write_reg_8() is called inside
> ade7754_write_frequency(), we are writing to this( ADE7754_WAVMODE)
> register. When writing to this register we don’t need to hold the
> buf_lock since ade7754_write_frequency() already takes care of that.
> This block of code does not use the buf_lock since that is taken care
> of by ade7754_write_frequency().
This strikes me as a very fragile way of coding this.
Also, unless I'm missing something, the lock taken there is still mlock...
>
> Gargi
>>> +
>>> mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
>>> st->tx[0] = ADE7754_WRITE_REG(reg_address);
>>> st->tx[1] = val;
>>> @@ -430,7 +439,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7754_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
>>> if (!val)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>> + mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
>>>
>>> t = 26000 / val;
>>> if (t > 0)
>>> @@ -451,7 +460,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7754_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
>>> ret = ade7754_spi_write_reg_8(dev, ADE7754_WAVMODE, reg);
>>>
>>> out:
>>> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
>>>
>>> return ret ? ret : len;
>>> }
>>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
