On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This still has the same issue my suggestion did. > If I were to hazard a guess, something stopped you building both > modules in when testing. I tweaked the mfd kconfig so I could. I added a patch for this too, somehow I still fail to get the right coverage, sorry. :( > Otherwise, a testing build on a platform with the spmi driver > doing allyes will having this issue (which is unlikely to be hit > terribly soon in test builds ;) > > Anyhow, still get: > > drivers/iio/adc/qcom-pm8xxx-xoadc.o: In function `qcom_vadc_decimation_from_dt': > (.text+0x192): multiple definition of `qcom_vadc_decimation_from_dt' > drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-vadc.o:(.text+0x192): first defined here > drivers/iio/adc/qcom-pm8xxx-xoadc.o: In function `qcom_vadc_scale': > (.text+0x4a): multiple definition of `qcom_vadc_scale' > drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-vadc.o:(.text+0x4a): first defined here > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:446: drivers/iio/adc/built-in.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:551: drivers/iio/adc] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:551: drivers/iio] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:988: drivers] Error 2 > > Because in the both build in we build the same symbol in twice. I discussed this with Arnd and it seems to be the case that I have to provide EXPORTs for the symbols to get anywhere with this. Fixing it up and also changing some stuff about the driver that I discussed in person with Björn. > Note there are some static's missing this first patch that should be > there as well so please clean those up in any new posting. I'll go over it, also added an inclusion guard. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
