On 2017-02-01 10:57, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote: >>> - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW), >>> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), >>> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | >>> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), >>> as originally intended >> >> I considered that option, but the code in mpl3115_read_raw (and >> mpl115_read_raw for that matter) return constants fro these values which >> to me indicated that they were not "separate" and as that would also be >> the change which replicated the exact behavior from before the regression >> I went with that. But I don't care either way, so I can re-spin if you >> want me to? (But don't blame me if that regresses in some other >> interesting way). > > no, all good; shared_by_type is the way to go > I'd rather respin for the not ORed comment in the patch Ok, but I think I'll wait a bit so that Ken Lin gets some time to verify that it actually solves the original problem. It should, but... Cheers, peda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
