Hi,
> I checked and find that iio device name is usually named to be with underline if it has more than one word, so I assigned to be " linear_accel_3d".
> I think the device property node named to be "in_linear_accel_x_raw" is better than " in_linearaccel_x_raw" Just follow the former coding style.
> "linearaccel" is only a name which specify IIO type [IIO_LINEAR_ACCEL]
> I name [IIO_LINEAR_ACCEL] to be "linearaccel" just follow the history code style in " iio_chan_type_name_spec[]" which do not have any underline.
> > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_linear_accel_x_raw
> > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_linear_accel_y_raw
> > +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_linear_accel_z_raw
>
> I think this would be in_linearaccel_x_raw, etc.?
> > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct bus_type iio_bus_type = {
> > [IIO_UVINDEX] = "uvindex",
> > [IIO_ELECTRICALCONDUCTIVITY] = "electricalconductivity",
> > [IIO_GRAVITY] = "gravity",
> > + [IIO_LINEAR_ACCEL] = "linearaccel",
> > };
linearaccel vs. linear_accel is a matter of taste, I have no preference;
nevertheless, the documentation should match what IIO outputs
if you have "linearaccel" in iio_bus_type, I think the name of a
LINEAR_ACCEL channel will end up as "in_linearaccel_x_raw" and must be
documented like that -- i.e. there is a mismatch between
documentation and actual code/output
probably your patches should be rebased, iio/testing branch has IIO_COUNT
and IIO_INDEX channels
regards, p.
--
Peter Meerwald-Stadler
+43-664-2444418 (mobile)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
