On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 08:56:07PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 03/10/16 05:00, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 12:35:26PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >> On 01/10/16 08:49, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
> >>> This driver predates the availability of IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ attribute
> >>> wherein usage has some advantages like it can be accessed by in-kernel
> >>> consumers as well as reduces the code size.
> >>>
> >>> Therefore, use IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ to implement the sampling_frequency
> >>> attribute instead of using IIO_DEV_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ() macro.
> >>>
> >>> Move code from the functions associated with IIO_DEV_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ() into
> >>> respective read and write hooks with the mask set to IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Given this is heading away from the generic staging fixes and into the
> >> list of specific IIO tasks, please do make sure to cc the linux-iio
> >> list.
> >>
> >> (I'd prefer that for all IIO touching patches - but give that's somewhat
> >> of an oddity for staging I don't really mind that much)
> >>
> >
> > My apologies for that. I will include the linux-iio list in the future
> > revisions and patch submissions. (cc'ing the list now..)
> >
> >> Otherwise, almost perfect, but there is a weird corner in this driver.
> >>
> >> Take a look at what write_raw_get_fmt is set to...
> >> For this write it should return be IIO_VAL_INT;
> >>
> >
> > I had set the return to IIO_VAL_INT already. Can you please point out where
> > else I had missed?
> You return that for the read which is quite correct, the interesting one
> is the write_raw callback change. Have a bit of a dig into how that knows
> what it is getting (in val and val2).
Hi Eva,
Replying back in this main thread to keep all in one place.
If you go look at the iio_info struct definition (be sure to scroll up
and see the comments), you'll find this info you need. I believe you'll
add a case for your new attribute to *write_raw_get_fmt().
See if that gets you further along.
Questions, please ask in this thread.
Thanks,
alisons
>
> >
> >> Lars / Michael, this driver is only a very small distance from being
> >> fine to move out of staging. I'm basically seeing two bits of
> >> custom ABI that need documenting and review, but otherwise post
> >> this cleanup looks in pretty good state to me.
> >>
> >
> > By any chance, are you referring to these:
> > static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED(in_v_m_v_scale_available,
> > in_voltage-voltage_scale_available,
> > S_IRUGO, ad7192_show_scale_available, NULL, 0);
> >
> > static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(in_voltage_scale_available, S_IRUGO,
> > ad7192_show_scale_available, NULL, 0);
> Those two are actually standard ABI (though there is a long term plan to handle
> the available attributes in a nicer fashion)
>
> The custom pair are bridge_switch_en and ac_excitation_en,
> >
> > Can you please guide me as to what to do next on the "documenting" part,
> > and should I send a patchset instead with this and the documentation bit
> > put together?
> This one definitely wants input from Lars-Peter. I don't know the hardware
> at all. It might be possible to work out what these are well enough to
> figure out if the ABI is 'right' (by which I mean well defined within the
> full set of IIO ABIs) and to work out some documentation.
>
> However such docs would still want a review from Lars or one of his colleagues.
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback,
> You are welcome.
>
> Jonathan
> > Eva
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> * Make commit message more detailed
> >>> * Fix tiny bug about bypassing iio_device_release_direct_mode()
> >>> * Remove unneeded goto and use break instead
> >>>
> >>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c | 75 ++++++++++------------------------
> >>> include/linux/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.h | 1 +
> >>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> >>> index 1cf6b79..e6e4505 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> >>> @@ -322,57 +322,6 @@ out:
> >>> return ret;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static ssize_t ad7192_read_frequency(struct device *dev,
> >>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
> >>> - char *buf)
> >>> -{
> >>> - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> >>> - struct ad7192_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >>> -
> >>> - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", st->mclk /
> >>> - (st->f_order * 1024 * AD7192_MODE_RATE(st->mode)));
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -static ssize_t ad7192_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
> >>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
> >>> - const char *buf,
> >>> - size_t len)
> >>> -{
> >>> - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> >>> - struct ad7192_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >>> - unsigned long lval;
> >>> - int div, ret;
> >>> -
> >>> - ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &lval);
> >>> - if (ret)
> >>> - return ret;
> >>> - if (lval == 0)
> >>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>> -
> >>> - ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> >>> - if (ret)
> >>> - return ret;
> >>> -
> >>> - div = st->mclk / (lval * st->f_order * 1024);
> >>> - if (div < 1 || div > 1023) {
> >>> - ret = -EINVAL;
> >>> - goto out;
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> - st->mode &= ~AD7192_MODE_RATE(-1);
> >>> - st->mode |= AD7192_MODE_RATE(div);
> >>> - ad_sd_write_reg(&st->sd, AD7192_REG_MODE, 3, st->mode);
> >>> -
> >>> -out:
> >>> - iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> >>> -
> >>> - return ret ? ret : len;
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -static IIO_DEV_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ(S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO,
> >>> - ad7192_read_frequency,
> >>> - ad7192_write_frequency);
> >>> -
> >>> static ssize_t
> >>> ad7192_show_scale_available(struct device *dev,
> >>> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >>> @@ -471,7 +420,6 @@ static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(ac_excitation_en, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> >>> AD7192_REG_MODE);
> >>>
> >>> static struct attribute *ad7192_attributes[] = {
> >>> - &iio_dev_attr_sampling_frequency.dev_attr.attr,
> >>> &iio_dev_attr_in_v_m_v_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> >>> &iio_dev_attr_in_voltage_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> >>> &iio_dev_attr_bridge_switch_en.dev_attr.attr,
> >>> @@ -484,7 +432,6 @@ static const struct attribute_group ad7192_attribute_group = {
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> static struct attribute *ad7195_attributes[] = {
> >>> - &iio_dev_attr_sampling_frequency.dev_attr.attr,
> >>> &iio_dev_attr_in_v_m_v_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> >>> &iio_dev_attr_in_voltage_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> >>> &iio_dev_attr_bridge_switch_en.dev_attr.attr,
> >>> @@ -536,6 +483,10 @@ static int ad7192_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >>> if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP)
> >>> *val -= 273 * ad7192_get_temp_scale(unipolar);
> >>> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> >>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> >>> + *val = st->mclk /
> >>> + (st->f_order * 1024 * AD7192_MODE_RATE(st->mode));
> >>> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> @@ -548,7 +499,7 @@ static int ad7192_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >>> long mask)
> >>> {
> >>> struct ad7192_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >>> - int ret, i;
> >>> + int ret, i, div;
> >>> unsigned int tmp;
> >>>
> >>> ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> >>> @@ -572,6 +523,22 @@ static int ad7192_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >>> break;
> >>> }
> >>> break;
> >>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> >>> + if (!val) {
> >>> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + div = st->mclk / (val * st->f_order * 1024);
> >>> + if (div < 1 || div > 1023) {
> >>> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + st->mode &= ~AD7192_MODE_RATE(-1);
> >>> + st->mode |= AD7192_MODE_RATE(div);
> >>> + ad_sd_write_reg(&st->sd, AD7192_REG_MODE, 3, st->mode);
> >>> + break;
> >>> default:
> >>> ret = -EINVAL;
> >>> }
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.h b/include/linux/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.h
> >>> index e7fdec4..5ba430c 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.h
> >>> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ int ad_sd_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct iio_trigger *trig);
> >>> .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
> >>> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET), \
> >>> .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), \
> >>> + .info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ), \
> >>> .scan_index = (_si), \
> >>> .scan_type = { \
> >>> .sign = 'u', \
> >>>
> >>
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
