Hi,
On 05-09-16 22:19, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 04/09/16 18:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
The mxc6225 is fully compatible with the existing mxc6255 driver,
add support for it.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Ah well. Can't find any docs on this on via google so I'll take
your word for it :)
I don't have docs either, but the android driver uses the same
registers and in the same way as the existing mxc6255 driver;
and I've also confirmed that this works on actual hardware.
Should I put something to this extend in the commit msg next
time ?
Regards,
Hans
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
---
drivers/iio/accel/mxc6255.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mxc6255.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mxc6255.c
index 97ccde7..50343a7 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/mxc6255.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mxc6255.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#define MXC6255_REG_YOUT 0x01
#define MXC6255_REG_CHIP_ID 0x08
+#define MXC6225_CHIP_ID 0xe5
#define MXC6255_CHIP_ID 0x05
/*
@@ -154,7 +155,11 @@ static int mxc6255_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return ret;
}
- if (chip_id != MXC6255_CHIP_ID) {
+ switch (chip_id) {
+ case MXC6225_CHIP_ID:
+ case MXC6255_CHIP_ID:
+ break;
+ default:
dev_err(&client->dev, "Invalid chip id %x\n", chip_id);
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -171,12 +176,14 @@ static int mxc6255_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
}
static const struct acpi_device_id mxc6255_acpi_match[] = {
+ {"MXC6225", 0},
{"MXC6255", 0},
{ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mxc6255_acpi_match);
static const struct i2c_device_id mxc6255_id[] = {
+ {"mxc6225", 0},
{"mxc6255", 0},
{ }
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
