On 02/09/16 19:27, Gregor Boirie wrote: > 7985e7c100 ("iio: Introduce a new fractional value type") introduced a > new IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL value type meant to represent rational type numbers > expressed by a numerator and denominator combination. > > Formating of IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL values relies upon do_div() usage. This > fails handling negative values properly since parameters are reevaluated > as unsigned values. > Fix this by using div_s64_rem() instead. Computed integer part will carry > properly signed value. Formatted fractional part will always be positive. > > Fixes: 7985e7c100 ("iio: Introduce a new fractional value type") > Signed-off-by: Gregor Boirie <gregor.boirie@xxxxxxxxxx> Hi Gregor, While this looks sensible to me, I always gain an almighty headache when I hit the various divide functions. Lars, the fractional code was yours in the first place. If you have time can you sanity check this please. Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > index f914d5d..d2b8899 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c > @@ -613,9 +613,8 @@ ssize_t iio_format_value(char *buf, unsigned int type, int size, int *vals) > return sprintf(buf, "%d.%09u\n", vals[0], vals[1]); > case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL: > tmp = div_s64((s64)vals[0] * 1000000000LL, vals[1]); > - vals[1] = do_div(tmp, 1000000000LL); > - vals[0] = tmp; > - return sprintf(buf, "%d.%09u\n", vals[0], vals[1]); > + vals[0] = (int)div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000, &vals[1]); > + return sprintf(buf, "%d.%09u\n", vals[0], abs(vals[1])); > case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2: > tmp = (s64)vals[0] * 1000000000LL >> vals[1]; > vals[1] = do_div(tmp, 1000000000LL); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html