On 07/13/2016 02:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jul 2016, Harald Geyer wrote:
Hi Ksenija!
Ksenija Stanojević writes:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+static int mxs_lradc_add_device(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct mxs_lradc *lradc, char *name, int i)
+{
+ struct mfd_cell *cell;
+
+ cell = &lradc->cells[i];
+ cell->name = name;
+ cell->platform_data = lradc;
+ cell->pdata_size = sizeof(*lradc);
+
+ return devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
+}
Please don't roll your own API.
Use 'struct mfd_cell' like everyone else does.
It has been suggested in previous reviews to use separate function to
register mfd device, and to make mfd_cell allocate dynamically because
struc mxs-lradc is allocated dynamically.
But I can revrse changes and make mfd_cells allocate staticaly
wthout separate function.
I think making mfd_cells members of struct mxs-lradc will address all
review comments.
No, please don't do that either.
It'd be nice if you explained in detail why not. Otherwise this is just
empty splat.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
