On 26/06/16 18:42, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 26/06/16 18:30, Sean Nyekjær wrote: >> >> >>> On 26. jun. 2016, at 18.51, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On 21/06/16 06:04, Sean Nyekjær wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 2016-06-11 19:26, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>>> On 29/05/16 15:12, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >>>>>>> On 05/29/2016 03:57 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>>>>> On 09/05/16 09:16, Sean Nyekjær wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2016-03-28 17:13, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/03/16 09:28, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/03/16 14:12, Sean Nyekjaer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean.nyekjaer@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>>> Looks much better to me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looking for Acks from Lars and a device tree binding maintainer >>>>>>>>>> on this one though. >>>>>>>>>> (added CCs) >>>>>>>>> Lars? >>>>>>>> No response... >>>>>>>> Is there anything wrong with this? >>>>>>> Given we are early in cycle there is no real rush for this... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lars, let me know if you are going to a while getting to this / any other >>>>>>> patches I want responses on from you. >>>>>> I don't think this solution is the correct approach, but since I'm not able >>>>>> to provide an alternative and everybody else is OK with it, I'm not going to >>>>>> block it either. So go ahead and apply it. >>>>> Hmm. I've applied this now. Perhaps we will revisit in the future and >>>>> eventually deprecate this binding in favour of something more generic. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your hard work on this Sean. It certainly wasn't a case >>>>> with obvious 'right' answers! >>>>> >>>>> Jonathan >>>> Hi Jonathan >>>> >>>> Where is this applied, i can't seen to find it? :-) >>>> If it failed some test, please let me know... >>> Sorry should have said. Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git on >>> kernel.org, but... That gets initially pushed out as testing >>> for the autobuilders to play with it. >>> >>> Basically it gives me a window with it as an 'unofficial' branch >>> so I can fix up an dumb stuff the autobuilders find. There >>> is rather less of that these days as the autobuilders try patches >>> off the list. >>> >>> Jonathan >>>> >>>> /Sean >>> >> Hi >> >> I see the builder gives some warnings with me not being consistent enough with the #ifdef CONFIG_OF >> I'll submit v6 tomorrow with this corrected > Cool. I clearly failed to push out at all last week given these > have only just come up. Sorry about that, have some recollection > of a garden crisis of some type! > Gah, forgot to say - dropped the two patches for now. Will pick up the v6 ones later in the week. Thanks, Jonathan > Jonathan >> >> /Sean-- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
