On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:47:14PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 31.05.2016 17:25, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:06AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 AM, William Breathitt Gray > >>> <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> With the introduction of the ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option, ISA-style > >>>> drivers may be built for X86_64 architectures. This patch changes the > >>>> ISA Kconfig option dependency of the PC/104 drivers to ISA_BUS_API, thus > >>>> allowing them to build for X86_64 as they are expected to. > > […] > >> Greg K-H, > >> > >> Would you be able to pick up this entire patchset via driver-core; I > >> figure that tree is the most appropriate to receive any core ISA bus > >> driver changes (unless you see a more fitting path to take). > > […] > > Yes, I can take this through the driver core tree as that's where the > > original series came from... > > Was this series merged or did it fell through the cracks? I currently > assume the latter, as I can't see it in neither mainline nor linux-next > (but maybe I'm missing something). Just wondering, because I have this > issue on my regression list for 4.7. > > For the whole context see: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17016/ > > Sincerely, your regression tracker for Linux 4.7 (http://bit.ly/28JRmJo) I don't think this is a regression, I was going to queue these up for 4.8-rc1. As it is now, 4.7-rc is working just fine in this regards, right? Or am I missing something? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
