On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24/03/16 09:23, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 03/24/2016 10:09 AM, Irina Tirdea wrote:
>>> config structure is set to 0 when updating the buffers, so by
>>> default config->watermark will be 0. When computing the minimum
>>> between config->watermark and the buffer->watermark or
>>> insert_buffer-watermark, this will always be 0 regardless of the
>>> value set by the user for the buffer.
>>>
>>> Set as initial value for config->watermark the maximum allowed
>>> value so that the minimum value will always be set from one of the
>>> buffers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Looks good. This bug was my fault, sorry.
>>
>> Fixes: f0566c0c405d ("iio: Set device watermark based on watermark of all
>> attached buffers")
> Applied to the fixes-togreg-post-rc1 branch of iio.git and marked for stable.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>> index b976332..90462fc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>> @@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ static int iio_verify_update(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>> unsigned int modes;
>>>
>>> memset(config, 0, sizeof(*config));
>>> + config->watermark = ~0;
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * If there is just one buffer and we are removing it there is nothing
>>>
>>
>
> --
Hi Jonathan,
After a discussion with Laurentiu (Cc'ed), we noticed that this patch
is not in the latest IIO (testing, togreg) tree.
What is the path of an IIO fixes patch?
thanks,
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
