On 30 May 2016 14:44:41 BST, Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.crestez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 05/29/2016 06:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On 18/05/16 16:00, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote: >>> Right now it is possible to only enable some of the x/y/z channels, >for >>> example you can enable accel_z without x or y but if you actually do >>> that what you get is actually only the x channel. >>> >>> Fix this by reformatting the hardware sample to only include the >>> requested channels. >> As it stands here there is no benefit in doing this over using the >core >> demux. In fact it's considerably less efficient (fair enough that you >> are keeping it simple in the first instance). >> The patch description should make that clear. > >Why is it less efficient? All it really does is a bunch of memcpy. Not doing agglomeration of neighbouring copies (iirc) not git either set of code to hand! > >> I'd definitely like to see simple extension of that option to handle >> a callback to get the nearest scanmask that is possible (as an >alternative >> to the static scan_masks_available list.) >> >> This only gets interesting if we are dealing with the unaligned case >and for >> these parts that only kicks in I think if the slave devices have say >3 bytes in >> their data type. > >But I want to deal with the unaligned case because it's better than >introducing odd validations on slave channels. If I added an extension >to get the nearest scanmask I would have to remove it in PATCH 7. Hmm I must have misread that. Though you were only supporting 16 bit channels for aux sensors. Then for now can we give this a slightly less generic name. I am not happy enough that we want this in the core 'yet'. Easy to rename later if it makes sense. Thanks Jonathan -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
