On 05/10/2016 12:00 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > commit 98ad8b41f58dff6b30713d7f09ae3834b8df7ded > ("iio: st_sensors: verify interrupt event to status") caused > a regression when reading ST sensors from a HRTimer trigger > rather than the intrinsic interrupts: the HRTimer may > trigger faster than the sensor provides new values, and > as the check against new values available as a cause of > the interrupt trigger was done in the poll function, > this would bail out of the HRTimer interrupt with > IRQ_NONE. > > So clearly we need to only check the new values available > from the proper interrupt handler and not from the poll > function, which should rather just read the raw values > from the registers, put them into the buffer and be happy. > > To achieve this: switch the ST Sensors over to using a true > threaded interrupt handler. > > In the interrupt thread, check if new values are available, > else yield to the (potential) next device on the same > interrupt line to check the registers. If the interrupt > was ours, proceed to poll the values. > > Instead of relying on iio_trigger_generic_data_rdy_poll() as > a top half to wake up the thread that polls the sensor for > new data, have the thread call iio_trigger_poll_chained() > after determining that is is the proper source of the > interrupt. This is modelled on drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c > which is already using a properly threaded interrupt handler. > > In order to get the same precision in timestamps as > previously, where samples would be timestamped in the > poll function pf->timestamp when calling > iio_trigger_generic_data_rdy_poll() we introduce a > local timestamp in the sensor data, set it in the top half > (fastpath) of the interrupt handler and provide that to the > core when calling iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(). > > Additionally: if the active scanmask is not set for the > sensor no IRQs should be enabled and we need to bail out > with IRQ_NONE. This can happen if spurious IRQs fire when > installing the threaded interrupt handler. > > Tested with hard interrupt triggers on LIS331DL, then also > tested with hrtimers on the same sensor by creating a 75Hz > HRTimer and using it to poll the sensor. > > Cc: Giuseppe Barba <giuseppe.barba@xxxxxx> > Cc: Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@xxxxxx> > Reported-by: Crestez Dan Leonard <cdleonard@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Crestez Dan Leonard <cdleonard@xxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: 97865fe41322 ("iio: st_sensors: verify interrupt event to status") > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch 2 is questionable but this patch works great and fixes a distinct issue. It should be applied separately. -- Regards, Leonard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html