> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-iio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-iio- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Meerwald-Stadler > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 2:25 PM > To: Breana, Tiberiu A <tiberiu.a.breana@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: accel: Add triggered buffer support for BMA220 > > > > Signed-off-by: Tiberiu Breana <tiberiu.a.breana@xxxxxxxxx> > > comments below > > > --- > > drivers/iio/accel/bma220_spi.c | 67 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > <snip> > > -70,6 +84,42 @@ static inline int bma220_read_reg(struct spi_device *spi, > u8 reg) > > return spi_w8r8(spi, reg | BMA220_READ_MASK); } > > > > +static irqreturn_t bma220_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p) { > > + int i; > > + int ret; > > + int bit; > > + struct iio_poll_func *pf = p; > > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev; > > + struct bma220_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > + struct spi_device *spi = data->spi_device; > > + u8 tx_buf = BMA220_REG_ACCEL_X | BMA220_READ_MASK; > > + u8 rx_buf[3]; > > alignment requirements for SPI? I'm not sure what you mean by this. The chip seems to respond correctly to the testing I've done so far. Tiberiu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
