On 2016-04-29 09:16, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Yes, obviously... I'll make that change locally and wait for the rest. > Another nit: You could use '--strict' with checkpatch and see if you > want to fix the issues reported. I am not keen on those (except for > 'space around operators'), it's a matter of taste I guess, but maybe you > like some of the suggestions. > Yes, they look like reasonable complaints. So, I fixed all of them locally except the complaint about lack of comment on the new struct mutex member in struct si2168_dev (patch 21/24), because that patch is Anttis and he's the maintainer of that driver... Antti, if you want that fixed as part of this series, send a suitable comment for the mutex this way and I'll incorporate it. Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
