On 04/19/2016 08:10 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 18/04/16 11:25, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote: >>> On 04/18/2016 09:07 AM, Denis Ciocca wrote: >>> Then st_combo_* implementation functions would forward to st_magn_* or >>> st_accel_* depending on chan->type. Does this make sense? >> Perhaps. If you have a short term need for this perhaps Denis and you can >> work together to speed up what he has 'in the works' for this? >> No point in duplicating work! >> >> The gyro element can go forward separately in the meantime. > > Isn't LSM9DS0 just a package of LSM303D and L3GD20 that could reuse > the drivers already present? That doesn't seem to be mentioned in the datasheets but I guessed that is a repacking of existing devices. The gyro part of the patch only adds IDs. It's ~10 lines spread around many files. For accel/magn parts there is a WHOAMI different from all others present and some registers also seem to be different. There doesn't seem to be explicit support for "LSM303D". I have no urgent need for this to work, I'm fine with waiting some time for st_sensor combo support. I can repost the gyro and accel+magn parts separately. But it's not clear that supporting an accel-only device would still make sense once combo support is available. So maybe I should just repost the gyro patch adding IDs? Regards, Leonard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
