On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Martin Kepplinger <martink@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Would it be ok, if adding in_accelX_power_mode to a driver, to extend it > so that in_accel_power_mode_available offers: > > low_noise low_power low_power_low_noise normal > > if there's a default "normal" mode, plus options to increase or decrease > oversampling / power consumption for my device? > > Specifically I'm unsure about "low_power_low_noise" being enough > user-friendly. The chip I work with just happens to offer these 4 modes. > Would you leave out "low_power_low_noise" and go with > > low_noise low_power normal > > or is it not even desired to add "normal" to the list? > > Although strictly not necessary, I would add any new addition to the > Documentation as well. The problem with this is that is not uniform across sensors. What chip are you looking at? For example INV6500 has: * sleep mode * standby mode * etc. Daniel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
