Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: humidity: si7020: replaced bitmask on humidity values with range check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



August 23 2015 10:12 PM, "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23/08/15 20:08, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> 
>> Jonathan Cameron schrieb am 23.08.2015 um 17:48:
>>> On 23/08/15 13:34, Nicola Corna wrote:
>>>> The maximum possible value for the relative humidity is 55575 (100%RH).
>>>> This value, if shifted right by 2 bits, uses 14 bits and masking it with
>>>> a 12 bit mask removes 2 meaningful bits.
>>>> The masking has been replaced with a range check that sets the minimum
>>>> value at 786 (0%RH) and the maximum at 13893 (99.998%RH).
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicola Corna <nicola@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx>
>>> 
>>> Applied. I have taken the view that previously the driver
>>> was 'limited' by this rather than a nasty bug.
>>> Hence I've queued it up for the next merge window.
>>> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git
>> 
>> This doesn't work, clamp_val() returns a result, which has to be assigned
>> to a variable (*val) in this case. I thought I pointed that out in V2.
> 
> backed out...
> 
> (hadn't pushed it out anywhere yet anyway ;)
> 
> Thanks Harmut.
> 

Well, I should have paid more attention. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Nicola Corna

>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Jonathan
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c | 6 +++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c b/drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c
>>>> index fa3b809..06e6659 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/humidity/si7020.c
>>>> @@ -57,8 +57,12 @@ static int si7020_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>>> if (ret < 0)
>>>> return ret;
>>>> *val = ret >> 2;
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Humidity values can slightly exceed the 0-100%RH
>>>> + * range and should be corrected by software
>>>> + */
>>>> if (chan->type == IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE)
>>>> - *val &= GENMASK(11, 0);
>>>> + clamp_val(*val, 786, 13893);
>> 
>> This needs to be: *val = clamp_val(...)
>> 
>>>> return IIO_VAL_INT;
>>>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>>>> if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP)
>>> 
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux