On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:10:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:12:31PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote: > > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm not sure why you're putting this in these commit messages... Just to not forget that Stephen should be in Cc as he introduced the switch case which removed the code that I add here again: f4298360a5c2 (regmap: Allow regmap_bulk_write() to work for "no-bus" regmaps) > > > if (!map->bus || map->use_single_rw) { > > + if (val_bytes != 1 && val_bytes != 2 && val_bytes != 4) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > switch statement please. This also looks like a separate change to the > handling of single writes. Sorry this was a left-over of a previous arrangement. Will remove it. > > > + } else if (map->use_single_rw) { > > + /* > > How are we ever going to fall into this else case? The first check has > an || map->use_single_rw it so if this is true then the first check will > be too so we'd never end up in this else case. Oh right, seems like another leftover of rebases :-/ sorry. The above condition should just be if (!map->bus) { Otherwise we fall into to this second case which is also able to handle for example 3 byte values. Thanks, Markus -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature