On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 14:59 +0100, jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > <snip> > Odd. The bma250e is documented as having an id of 0xf9 not 0xf8. > http://ae-bst.resource.bosch.com/media/products/dokumente/bma250e/BST > -BMA250 > E-DS004-05_published.pdf > > So all I can think of is that the chip is a bma222e (or something > else > with the 0xf8 chip id) or there are some bma250e's out there with > the wrong ID... > > Someone changed a part on the device and thought no one would notice > and hence didn't update the bios? (even if it has a totally different > range) > > I guess if you frig the driver to load anyway we can see what value > it is giving for g and that should give us more of a clue. I've sent 1 preparation patch, and one fixup patch to ignore the ACPI/I2C ID when selecting the chip type. Cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
