On 19 July 2015 21:49:47 BST, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:33:43PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> I didn't necessarily read the thread that way, but the thread was >> long... > >I read the thread as saying that you sometimes get: > >Reviewed-by: Some Person <email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >With no other comments and what does that even mean because you don't >know who that person is and if they are good at reviewing. There isn't >a solution to that. But since we know Marek then that doesn't really >apply here. Absolutely. Though I also got the impression that many won't give reviewed by for the little stuff but keep it for more substantial cases. > Also people were worried that companies were going to >start >counting Reviewed-by tags so we should discourage that. > >Anyway, I don't see Reviewed-by tags as a reward, only as added >responsibility. True but I wish we had a way to make some of our unsung heroes at the coal face rather less unsung. > >regards, >dan carpenter > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
