On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:39 AM, <harald@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jul 2015 22:00:02 +0100, Jonathan Bell > <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> - Cater for GPIO chips that can raise interrupts when I/O pins >> are set as output by expanding the maximum number of edges recorded. >> - Start decoding the bitstream right-justified to make the driver > agnostic >> towards whether the start bits generate IRQs. > > That was the original behaviour, but is actively prohibited by some GPIO > chip drivers. We asked Linus Walleij about it in > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/1/171 who replied: > "IRQs on pins set to output *does* *not* *make* *sense*." I still > disagree, I just don't understand this usecase. Can you explain to me what you are doing and why exactly so as to soften me up a bit? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
