The initial compensation was mistakingly toggling an extra bit in the
control register. Fix this and make sure it's less likely to happen by
introducing an additional macro.
Reported-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Dogaru <vlad.dogaru@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c
index ba1cbbe..798b973 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9500.c
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
#define SX9500_COMPSTAT_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
#define SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS 4
+#define SX9500_CHAN_MASK GENMASK(SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS - 1, 0)
struct sx9500_data {
struct mutex mutex;
@@ -802,8 +803,7 @@ static int sx9500_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
unsigned int val;
ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9500_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
- GENMASK(SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS, 0),
- GENMASK(SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS, 0));
+ SX9500_CHAN_MASK, SX9500_CHAN_MASK);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static int sx9500_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
out:
regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9500_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
- GENMASK(SX9500_NUM_CHANNELS, 0), 0);
+ SX9500_CHAN_MASK, 0);
return ret;
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
