Re: [PATCH] iio: Fix parameters in iio_triggered_buffer_setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/06/15 13:06, Cristina Opriceana wrote:
>> This patch renames the top half handler and the bottom half handler
>> of iio_triggered_buffer_setup() in accordance with their usage.
>> The names of the parameters were swapped, thus creating confusion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristina Opriceana <cristina.opriceana@xxxxxxxxx>
> Good point.  This is definitely misleading.  I wonder if the _th naming
> is a good idea anymore though given that the bottom half (in the traditional
> sense) is now a thread based call and hence the th might be confusing?
> Perhaps the h and thread naming used in the pollfunc code would be clearer?
>

Sounds like a good idea. Cristina can prepare a patch for this.

> Lars, this bit was yours originally.  Any thoughts?

Lets wait for Lars thoughts on this.

Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux