On 18.05.2015 11:19, Antoine Tenart wrote:
This patch adds the ADC node for the Berlin BG2Q, using the newly added
Berlin IIO ADC driver.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
index 187d056f7ad2..97c7e19e3ec6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
@@ -565,6 +565,13 @@
function = "twsi3";
};
};
+
+ adc: adc {
+ compatible = "marvell,berlin2-adc";
+ interrupt-parent = <&sic>;
Antoine,
a side note on the interrupt-parent property above:
The parent simple-bus node already contains that property. If you
remove the property here, don't the interrupt routines go up the
hierarchy until they find an interrupt-parent set?
So, is it safe to get rid of the extra interrupt-parent property on
the adc node?
Sebastian
+ interrupts = <12>, <14>;
+ interrupt-names = "adc", "tsen";
+ };
};
sic: interrupt-controller@e000 {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
