Re: Advice needed on combination sensor driver implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:51 PM,  <jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> utkarsh.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I am looking at implementing FXOS8700 driver, which consists of an
>> accelerometer and magnetometer, into the linux kernel 4.0. This device can
>> function independently as accel and magnetometer however it has been
>> recommended to implement it as one driver in order to achieve consistency
>> and synchronized functionality of both modules.
>> Please advice on whether this driver could be implemented as
>> accel_magnetometer combined driver in a separate folder in iio? Or should
>> this be implemented as separate accel and magnetometer modules in their
>> corresponding existing folders in iio?
>
>
> Hi, Just been reading the datasheet over lunch.  This is a bit more
> interesting than the usual approach of simply putting two bits of silicon
> into one package, and the two sensors are tightly coupled.
> As such it's similar to the full IMUs such as the ADIS16400 and similar.
> Anyhow, definitely a unified driver. Location wise, I'm tempted to suggest
> we rename the IMU directory as 'combined' or something similar and drop
> all properly integrated multiple sensor devices in there.

s/combined/combo would be better.

Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux