On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:07:03 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED), > > + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) > > + | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW), > > }, > These cases strike me as problematic. You should not need both. If > the consumer is reading _raw from a channel that only supplies > PROCESSED then that is the bug, not the lack of support for a raw > read. > > }; Very sorry about the delay, you are right that we should just need RAW. V2 patch just sent. Thanks, Jacob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
