Re: [iio:testing 10/10] ERROR: "__divdi3" [drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.ko] undefined!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28 Mar 2015 16:18, "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 28/03/15 13:02, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git testing
> > head:   5e02849a682600c1663a333f95f0388d1c536108
> > commit: 5e02849a682600c1663a333f95f0388d1c536108 [10/10] iio: bmc150_accel: add support for hardware fifo
> > config: m68k-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> > reproduce:
> >   wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >   chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >   git checkout 5e02849a682600c1663a333f95f0388d1c536108
> >   # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >   make.cross ARCH=m68k
> >
> > All error/warnings:
> >
> >>> ERROR: "__divdi3" [drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.ko] undefined!
> Oops, missed that.  I think we can use a simple do_div for computing the sample_period
> (which included 64bit / 8 bit).
>
> Will push out a patch to the testing branch to see if they autobuilders are
> happy with it then fix up the driver properly if they are.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> index c639489671bb..d5e103b208ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> @@ -1002,7 +1002,8 @@ static int __bmc150_accel_fifo_flush(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>          * To avoid this issue we compute the actual sample period ourselves
>          * based on the timestamp delta between the last two flush operations.
>          */
> -       sample_period = (data->timestamp - data->old_timestamp) / count;
> +       sample_period = (data->timestamp - data->old_timestamp);
> +       do_div(sample_period, count);
>         tstamp = data->timestamp - (count - 1) * sample_period;
>
>         if (samples && count > samples)
>

Oops, sorry about this Jonathan and thank you for fixing it so quickly.

One more thing, I marked the new sysfs entries for 4.2, but it seems
that these might make it in 4.1. Should I send a patch to correct
this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux