On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 02:04:35PM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Mika Westerberg
>> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:12:16PM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Mika Westerberg
>> >> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:25:05PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> >> >> I think we can do the same for ACPI GpioInts so that we introduce
>> >> >> acpi_gpio_irq_get() that translates from GpioInt to Linux IRQ
>> >> >> numberspace. Then we can do something like below in I2C core:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> if (client->irq <= 0) {
>> >> >> int irq = -ENOENT;
>> >> >>
>> >> >> if (dev->of_node)
>> >> >> irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
>> >> >> else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev))
>> >> >> irq = acpi_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), 0);
>> >> >>
>> >> >> if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> >> >> return irq;
>> >> >> if (irq < 0)
>> >> >> irq = 0;
>> >> >>
>> >> >> client->irq = irq;
>> >> >> }
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Now it has the drawback that the first GpioInt will not be available to
>> >> >> the driver anymore (as a GPIO since it is locked) but if DT already does
>> >> >> the same we should be fine.
>> >> >
>> >> > Below patch should take care of this.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> One issue we noticed is that now the gpio request and set input
>> >> directions operations are not called anymore. Some gpio controller
>> >> drivers (dln2, adnp, lynx_point from quickly browsing the code) do not
>> >> explicitly enable the GPIO pin nor set direction to input when the
>> >> interrupt is enabled. Depending on hardware this may be an issue - it
>> >> is on dln2 for example.
>> >>
>> >> Should the gpio controllers enable and set to input in irq_enable,
>> >> irq_bus_sync_unlock, etc.? Or should this be done in gpiolib?
>> >
>> > Good question.
>> >
>> > In general I think that it is assumed that the boot firmware configures
>> > the pin upfront. However, we have seen too many times that it actually
>> > doesn't happen or it is configured wrong.
>> >
>> > Perhaps we could do this in GPIO core, for example in
>> > gpiochip_irq_reqres/gpiochip_irq_map or so.
>> >
>>
>> That sounds good to me. We tested your patch with the patch below and
>> we can now directly use client->irq:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> index 568aa2b..9865627 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> @@ -511,6 +511,19 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops gpiochip_domain_ops = {
>> static int gpiochip_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
>> {
>> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = gpiod_request(&chip->desc[d->hwirq], "IRQ");
>> + if (ret) {
>> + chip_err(chip, "unable to request %lu for IRQ\n", d->hwirq);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> What if the driver has already requested the GPIO?
>
Initially I implemented the above to take that into account, e.g. if
(test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) ...
But than I thought that we can't mess up with the GPIO anyway while
the interrupt is in use.
One case I missed was if the user wants to read the GPIO while using
it as an interrupt which seems to be possible...
>> +
>> + ret = gpiod_direction_input(&chip->desc[d->hwirq]);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + chip_err(chip, "unable to set HW IRQ %lu as input\n", d->hwirq);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> if (gpiochip_lock_as_irq(chip, d->hwirq)) {
>> chip_err(chip,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
