Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iio: bmc150: introduce bmc150_accel_interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 11:22 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 03/03/15 16:17, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > Since both triggers and events can share an interrupt, add a data
> > structure that tracks the users of an interrupt so that it enables or
> > disables it only for the first users and respectively last user.
> > 
> > This will allows us to easily add more events or triggers.
> > 
> > The patch also adds an interrupt enabled counter, so that we can
> > easily know if we need to put the device in normal mode when the
> > resume callback is issued.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx>
> As I stated before I'd like an Ack from Srinivas on this
> (obviously Srinivas, if you've handed the driver maintenance over
> to Octavian just let me know and I'll stop pestering you ;)

Reviewed-by:: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


I prefer to test before Acks. Since Octavian is adding Fifo support and
many changes, If Octavian wants he can take over the maintenance of this
driver.


Thanks,
Srinivas

> 

> Jonathan
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> > index 74ee54e..70497c3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> > @@ -147,10 +147,24 @@ struct bmc150_accel_chip_info {
> >  	const struct bmc150_scale_info scale_table[4];
> >  };
> >  
> > +struct bmc150_accel_interrupt {
> > +	const struct bmc150_accel_interrupt_info *info;
> > +	atomic_t users;
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum bmc150_accel_interrupt_id {
> > +	BMC150_ACCEL_INT_DATA_READY,
> > +	BMC150_ACCEL_INT_ANY_MOTION,
> > +	BMC150_ACCEL_INT_WATERMARK,
> > +	BMC150_ACCEL_INTERRUPTS,
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct bmc150_accel_data {
> >  	struct i2c_client *client;
> > +	struct bmc150_accel_interrupt interrupts[BMC150_ACCEL_INTERRUPTS];
> >  	struct iio_trigger *dready_trig;
> >  	struct iio_trigger *motion_trig;
> > +	atomic_t active_intr;
> >  	struct mutex mutex;
> >  	s16 buffer[8];
> >  	u8 bw_bits;
> > @@ -421,7 +435,7 @@ static const struct bmc150_accel_interrupt_info {
> >  	u8 map_bitmask;
> >  	u8 en_reg;
> >  	u8 en_bitmask;
> > -} bmc150_accel_interrupts[] = {
> > +} bmc150_accel_interrupts[BMC150_ACCEL_INTERRUPTS] = {
> >  	{ /* data ready interrupt */
> >  		.map_reg = BMC150_ACCEL_REG_INT_MAP_1,
> >  		.map_bitmask = BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MAP_1_BIT_DATA,
> > @@ -438,12 +452,30 @@ static const struct bmc150_accel_interrupt_info {
> >  	},
> >  };
> >  
> > -static int bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
> > -				const struct bmc150_accel_interrupt_info *info,
> > +static void bmc150_accel_interrupts_setup(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > +					  struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < BMC150_ACCEL_INTERRUPTS; i++)
> > +		data->interrupts[i].info = &bmc150_accel_interrupts[i];
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int i,
> >  				      bool state)
> >  {
> > +	struct bmc150_accel_interrupt *intr = &data->interrupts[i];
> > +	const struct bmc150_accel_interrupt_info *info = intr->info;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > +	if (state) {
> > +		if (atomic_inc_return(&intr->users) > 1)
> > +			return 0;
> > +	} else {
> > +		if (atomic_dec_return(&intr->users) > 0)
> > +			return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
> >  	 * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
> > @@ -493,6 +525,11 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
> >  		goto out_fix_power_state;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (state)
> > +		atomic_inc(&data->active_intr);
> > +	else
> > +		atomic_dec(&data->active_intr);
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> >  out_fix_power_state:
> > @@ -500,20 +537,6 @@ out_fix_power_state:
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int bmc150_accel_setup_any_motion_interrupt(
> > -					struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
> > -					bool status)
> > -{
> > -	return bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(data, &bmc150_accel_interrupts[1],
> > -					  status);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int bmc150_accel_setup_new_data_interrupt(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
> > -						 bool status)
> > -{
> > -	return bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(data, &bmc150_accel_interrupts[0],
> > -					  status);
> > -}
> >  
> >  static int bmc150_accel_set_scale(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val)
> >  {
> > @@ -753,13 +776,8 @@ static int bmc150_accel_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> >  
> > -	if (!state && data->motion_trigger_on) {
> > -		data->ev_enable_state = 0;
> > -		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> > -		return 0;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	ret =  bmc150_accel_setup_any_motion_interrupt(data, state);
> > +	ret = bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(data, BMC150_ACCEL_INT_ANY_MOTION,
> > +					 state);
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> >  		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> >  		return ret;
> > @@ -996,19 +1014,16 @@ static int bmc150_accel_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (!state && data->ev_enable_state && data->motion_trigger_on) {
> > -		data->motion_trigger_on = false;
> > -		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> > -		return 0;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	if (data->motion_trig == trig) {
> >  		ret = bmc150_accel_update_slope(data);
> >  		if (!ret)
> > -			ret = bmc150_accel_setup_any_motion_interrupt(data,
> > -								      state);
> > +			ret = bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(data,
> > +						 BMC150_ACCEL_INT_ANY_MOTION,
> > +							 state);
> >  	} else {
> > -		ret = bmc150_accel_setup_new_data_interrupt(data, state);
> > +		ret = bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(data,
> > +						 BMC150_ACCEL_INT_DATA_READY,
> > +						 state);
> >  	}
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> >  		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> > @@ -1206,6 +1221,8 @@ static int bmc150_accel_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  			return ret;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		bmc150_accel_interrupts_setup(indio_dev, data);
> > +
> >  		data->dready_trig = devm_iio_trigger_alloc(&client->dev,
> >  							   "%s-dev%d",
> >  							   indio_dev->name,
> > @@ -1321,8 +1338,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  	struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> > -	if (data->dready_trigger_on || data->motion_trigger_on ||
> > -							data->ev_enable_state)
> > +	if (atomic_read(&data->active_intr))
> >  		bmc150_accel_set_mode(data, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_MODE_NORMAL, 0);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> >  
> > 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux