On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >> +static int mx25_tsadc_setup_irq(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> >> + struct mx25_tsadc *tsadc)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> >> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> >> + int irq;
>> >> +
>> >> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> >> + if (irq < 0) {
>> >
>> > What if 0 is returned?
>>
>> Then imx25.dtsi would be passing irq=0 for the ADC, which would be
>> totally wrong.
>
> Exactly, so it should be <=.
imx25.dtsi passes interrupts = <46>; for the touch screen controller,
so the irq number will never be zero.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
