Pandruvada, Srinivas schrieb am 19.01.2015 um 17:56:
> On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 18:49 +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas
>> <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 16:40 +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas
>>>> <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> +Mika
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 13:26 -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 00:25 +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Daniel Baluta schrieb am 18.12.2014 um 18:16:
>>>>>>>>> When using ACPI, if acpi_match_device fails then chipset enum will be
>>>>>>>>> uninitialized and &ak_def_array[chipset] will point to some bad address.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am missing something. You are enumerated over i2c device, which was
>>>>>> created from ACPI PNP resource. There is a valid handle or and the
>>>>>> device has an ACPI companion at the least. If this failing, I have to
>>>>>> check the code for acpi i2c.
>>>>>> Can you check why this check failed? We may have bug in i2c handling.
>>>>
>>>> You are right about this. Under normal circumstances, if probe is called
>>>> then acpi_match_device will not fail. I even tried to remove the
>>>> device after probe
>>>> but before acpi_match_device, anyhow acpi_match_device was still successful :)
>>>>
>>>> This is more a matter of code correctness.
>>>>
>>>> In ak8975_match_acpi_device we have:
>>>>
>>>> » const struct acpi_device_id *id;
>>>>
>>>> » id = acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, dev);
>>>> » if (!id)
>>>> » » return NULL;
>>>> » *chipset = (int)id->driver_data;
>>>>
>>>> Compiler complains on the fact that chipset might be uninitialized
>>>> if this returns NULL, and we shouldn't ignore this warning even this case
>>>> will never happen.
>>>>
>>> Will this fix?
>>> data->chipset = AK8975;
>>> before
>>> ak8975_match_acpi_device(&client->dev, &data->chipset);
>>>
This would fix the compiler warning, but doesn't seem the right solution for
this issue. Quoting the description of acpi_match_device:
"Return a pointer to the first matching ID on success or %NULL on failure."
So, even if it is very unlikely to for it to fail - if it does fail, the
error should be handled as quick as possible. I would favor Daniels solution
to check for a valid assignment of name.
>>
>> Yes, this is done in the original patch:
>>
>> + *chipset = AK_MAX_TYPE;
> Since data memory is not zero alloced, other member of data are anyway
> initialized, so adding this also may be better.
If there did not occur an error condition, it will be assigned a value
before being checked for valid ranges. And if there is an error, probe
should be aborted, anyway. So initializing *chipset doesn't seem to add
any benefit IMHO.
>>
>> .. and fixes the warning.
>>
>> Daniel.
>
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{��*"��^n�r���z���h����&�� �G���h�(�階�ݢj"���m�����z�ޖ���f���h���~�mml==
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
