Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: Add i2c mux for by pass

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 21:53 +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> Srinivas Pandruvada schrieb am 17.10.2014 19:11:
> > This chip has a mode in which this chipset can be i2c master. But
> > the current upstream driver doesn't support such mode as there is
> > some limited support of clients, which can be connected.
> > 
> > To attach such clients to main i2c bus chip has to be set up in
> > bypass mode. Creates an i2c mux, which will enable/disable this mode.
> > This was discussed for a while in mailing list, this was the decision.
> > 
> > This change also provides an API, which allows clients to be created for
> > this mux adapter.
> > 
> Hi,
> I found a few things in line, which could be improved.
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig        |   1 +
> >  drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h  |   9 ++
> >  3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig
> > index 2d0608b..48fbc0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config INV_MPU6050_IIO
> >  	depends on I2C && SYSFS
> >  	select IIO_BUFFER
> >  	select IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER
> > +	select I2C_MUX
> >  	help
> >  	  This driver supports the Invensense MPU6050 devices.
> >  	  This driver can also support MPU6500 in MPU6050 compatibility mode
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > index b75519d..9864362 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/kfifo.h>
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c-mux.h>
> >  #include "inv_mpu_iio.h"
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@ static const struct inv_mpu6050_reg_map reg_set_6050 = {
> >  	.int_enable             = INV_MPU6050_REG_INT_ENABLE,
> >  	.pwr_mgmt_1             = INV_MPU6050_REG_PWR_MGMT_1,
> >  	.pwr_mgmt_2             = INV_MPU6050_REG_PWR_MGMT_2,
> > +	.int_pin_cfg		= INV_MPU6050_REG_INT_PIN_CFG,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const struct inv_mpu6050_chip_config chip_config_6050 = {
> > @@ -72,11 +74,147 @@ static const struct inv_mpu6050_hw hw_info[INV_NUM_PARTS] = {
> >  	},
> >  };
> >  
> > +static struct i2c_adapter *inv_mux_adapter;
> > +
> >  int inv_mpu6050_write_reg(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int reg, u8 d)
> >  {
> >  	return i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(st->client, reg, 1, &d);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * The i2c read/write needs to happen in unlocked mode. As the parent
> > + * adapter is common. If we use locked versions, it will fail as
> > + * the mux adapter will lock the parent i2c adapter, while calling
> > + * select/deselect functions.
> > + */
> > +static int inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st,
> > +					  int reg, u8 d)
> reg should be u8.
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	u8 buf[2];
> > +	struct i2c_msg msg[1] = {
> > +		{
> > +			.addr = st->client->addr,
> > +			.flags = 0,
> > +			.len = sizeof(buf),
> > +			.buf = buf,
> > +		}
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	buf[0] = reg;
> > +	buf[1] = d;
> > +	ret = __i2c_transfer(st->client->adapter, msg, 1);
> > +	if (ret != 1)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> return (ret != 1) ? ret : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int inv_mpu6050_select_bypass(struct i2c_adapter *adap, void *mux_priv,
> > +				     u32 chan_id)
> > +{
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = mux_priv;
> > +	struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	/* Use the same mutex which was used everywhere to protect power-op */
> Did you mean power-up?
I meant to say power - operation, which includes power-up and
power-down.
> > +	mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +	if (!st->powerup_count) {
> > +		ret = inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(st, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1,
> > +						     0);
> > +		if (!ret)
> > +			msleep(INV_MPU6050_REG_UP_TIME);
> A bit of an uncommon way. It would be more straight-forward (although longer) to do:
> if (ret)
> 	goto label_of_mutex_unlock;
> msleep(...);
> > +	}
> > +	if (!ret) {
> > +		st->powerup_count++;
> > +		ret = inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(st, st->reg->int_pin_cfg,
> > +						st->client->irq |
> > +						INV_MPU6050_BIT_BYPASS_EN);
> Indentation of these parameters should be improved.
The usual alignment doesn't work as the last INV_.. goes beyond 80
chars.
> > +	}
> > +	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int inv_mpu6050_deselect_bypass(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > +				       void *mux_priv, u32 chan_id)
> > +{
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = mux_priv;
> > +	struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +	/* It doesn't really mattter, if any of the calls fails */
> > +	inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(st, st->reg->int_pin_cfg,
> > +				       st->client->irq);
> > +	st->powerup_count--;
> > +	if (!st->powerup_count)
> > +		inv_mpu6050_write_reg_unlocked(st, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1,
> > +					       INV_MPU6050_BIT_SLEEP);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int inv_mpu6050_create_mux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct inv_mpu6050_state *mpu_st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> Better be consistent with instance names for inv_mpu6050_state.
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = mpu_st->client;
> > +
> > +	mpu_st->mux_adapter = i2c_add_mux_adapter(client->adapter,
> > +						  &client->dev,
> > +						  indio_dev,
> > +						  0, 0, 0,
> > +						  inv_mpu6050_select_bypass,
> > +						  inv_mpu6050_deselect_bypass);
> > +	if (mpu_st->mux_adapter == NULL) {
> > +		dev_err(&mpu_st->client->dev, "Mux create Failed\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +	inv_mux_adapter = mpu_st->mux_adapter;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void inv_mpu6050_destroy_mux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct inv_mpu6050_state *mpu_st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > +	if (mpu_st->mux_adapter)
> > +		i2c_del_mux_adapter(mpu_st->mux_adapter);
> > +	inv_mux_adapter = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct i2c_client *inv_mpu6050_add_mux_client(char *name, int addr,
> addr could be unsigned short.

> > +					      int irq, void *plat_data)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client;
> > +	struct i2c_board_info info;
> > +
> > +	if (!inv_mux_adapter)
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(struct i2c_board_info));
> > +	strlcpy(info.type, name, sizeof(info.type));
> > +	info.addr = addr;
> > +	info.irq = irq;
> > +	info.platform_data = plat_data;
> > +	client = i2c_new_device(inv_mux_adapter, &info);
> > +	if (!client) {
> > +		dev_err(&inv_mux_adapter->dev,
> > +			"failed to create mux clint %d\n", addr);
> Typo: client
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return client;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inv_mpu6050_add_mux_client);
> > +
> > +void inv_mpu6050_del_mux_client(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +{
> > +	i2c_unregister_device(client);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inv_mpu6050_del_mux_client);
> > +
> >  int inv_mpu6050_switch_engine(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, bool en, u32 mask)
> >  {
> >  	u8 d, mgmt_1;
> > @@ -133,13 +271,22 @@ int inv_mpu6050_switch_engine(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, bool en, u32 mask)
> >  
> >  int inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, bool power_on)
> >  {
> > -	int result;
> > +	int result = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (power_on) {
> > +		/* Already under indio-dev->mlock mutex */
> > +		if (!st->powerup_count)
> > +			result = inv_mpu6050_write_reg(st, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1,
> > +						       0);
> > +		if (!result)
> > +			st->powerup_count++;
> > +	} else {
> > +		st->powerup_count--;
> > +		if (!st->powerup_count)
> > +			result = inv_mpu6050_write_reg(st, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1,
> > +						       INV_MPU6050_BIT_SLEEP);
> > +	}
> >  
> > -	if (power_on)
> > -		result = inv_mpu6050_write_reg(st, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1, 0);
> > -	else
> > -		result = inv_mpu6050_write_reg(st, st->reg->pwr_mgmt_1,
> > -						INV_MPU6050_BIT_SLEEP);
> >  	if (result)
> >  		return result;
> >  
> > @@ -673,6 +820,7 @@ static int inv_mpu_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  
> >  	st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >  	st->client = client;
> > +	st->powerup_count = 0;
> >  	pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> >  	if (pdata)
> >  		st->plat_data = *pdata;
> > @@ -720,6 +868,8 @@ static int inv_mpu_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  		goto out_remove_trigger;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	inv_mpu6050_create_mux(indio_dev);
> Shouldn't that be tested like this?
> result = inv_mpu6050_create_mux(indio_dev);
> if (result)
> 	goto out_device_unregister;
> > +
Makes sense. I avoided bailing out because of mux creation for folks who
didn't connect anything to INVXX i2c bus.
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> out_device_unregister:
> 	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> >  out_remove_trigger:
> > @@ -734,6 +884,7 @@ static int inv_mpu_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> >  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> >  	struct inv_mpu6050_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >  
> > +	inv_mpu6050_destroy_mux(indio_dev);
> >  	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> >  	inv_mpu6050_remove_trigger(st);
> >  	iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > index e779931..90697c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_iio.h
> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_reg_map {
> >  	u8 int_enable;
> >  	u8 pwr_mgmt_1;
> >  	u8 pwr_mgmt_2;
> > +	u8 int_pin_cfg;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /*device enum */
> > @@ -119,6 +120,8 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_state {
> >  	enum   inv_devices chip_type;
> >  	spinlock_t time_stamp_lock;
> >  	struct i2c_client *client;
> > +	struct i2c_adapter *mux_adapter;
> > +	int powerup_count;
> unsigned int?
> >  	struct inv_mpu6050_platform_data plat_data;
> >  	DECLARE_KFIFO(timestamps, long long, TIMESTAMP_FIFO_SIZE);
> >  };
> > @@ -179,6 +182,9 @@ struct inv_mpu6050_state {
> >  /* 6 + 6 round up and plus 8 */
> >  #define INV_MPU6050_OUTPUT_DATA_SIZE         24
> >  
> > +#define INV_MPU6050_REG_INT_PIN_CFG	0x37
> > +#define INV_MPU6050_BIT_BYPASS_EN	0x2
> > +
> >  /* init parameters */
> >  #define INV_MPU6050_INIT_FIFO_RATE           50
> >  #define INV_MPU6050_TIME_STAMP_TOR           5
> > @@ -245,3 +251,6 @@ int inv_reset_fifo(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> >  int inv_mpu6050_switch_engine(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, bool en, u32 mask);
> >  int inv_mpu6050_write_reg(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int reg, u8 val);
> >  int inv_mpu6050_set_power_itg(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, bool power_on);
> > +struct i2c_client *inv_mpu6050_add_mux_client(char *name, int adddr,
> u8 addr? (also typo addr)
> > +					      int irq, void *plat_data);
> > +void inv_mpu6050_del_mux_client(struct i2c_client *client);
> > 
> 

Thanks,
Srinivas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux