On Sat, 2014-10-18 at 13:14 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 18/10/14 12:50, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > On 10/18/2014 01:42 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On 02/10/14 13:32, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > > > When #iio-cells is greater than '0', the driver could provide > > > > a custom of_xlate function that reads the *args* and returns > > > > the appropriate index in registered IIO channels array. > > > > > > > > > Add simple translation function, suitable for the most 1:1 > > > > mapped channels in IIO chips, and use it when driver did not > > > > provide custom implementation. > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Any more comments on this? Been sat a while and the > > > discussions seems > > > to have died out. > > > > > > > As Ivan has pointed out, very similar approaches are used > > > elsewhere (gpio for example). > > > > Looks good to me: > > > > Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > When we initially added the DT support to IIO I was hoping that > > we can get away > > with just using the simple and generic xlate function for all > > devices. But it > > looks as if some more complex devices need to overwrite it. We > > should be careful > > about adding new driver specific xlate implementations and make > > sure that it is > > actually needed. > > > > One thing we might want to consider though is instead of adding > > the xlate > > callback to the iio_dev struct add it to the iio_info struct > > since it should be > > the same for different device instances of the same driver. And > > this is also > > where all the other callbacks are. > Good point - would definitely prefer that. Thank you. Will rework it as suggested. Regards, Ivan > > J > > > > - Lars > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
