On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:07:32PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:02:27AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> > Alright, this is already ridiculous. Andrew, if I resend the patch can > >> > you apply it since maintainer has been ignoring this thread anyway ? > >> > > >> > >> Do you reall think this is the best way to approach this? > > > > when maintainer doesn't respond for weeks, yeah! Sure it is. > > This is ridiculous! Jonathan asked you some questions about the implementation, > but you ignored the request. Instead you've send 9 ping emails! I ignored ? I replied straight away asking him to tell me exactly what he needed and pointing out all the things which he's complaining about that he asked me to get rid of himself. For example, original driver was using devm_*, Jonathan asked to remove, I tried arguing and he said he wanted them out, so I removed, now he's asking me why I didn't use devm_* to start with. That's ridiculous, that's what pointless and a total waste of time. Not to mention that there was a long hiatus from Jonathan for weeks until he said "yeah, sorry, I had forgotten about this". Because of Jonathan alone, we lost a merge window. I send the original driver because v3.17-rc1 was even tagged and now you tell me that it's ridiculous I'm upset with Jonathan's lazy responses ? gimme a break -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
