On 5/11/2012 8:54 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Since everyone seems to have put his Acked-By (Nicolas, Arnd and you),
are you ok to merge it in your tree ?
You still had some minor comments, do you you want me to post a new
patchset to the mailing list, or a public git branch would be enough ?
IIO is still in staging from the point of view of git trees. Hence Greg
will actually merge the patches. Could you send him a clean set
with all the acks etc. (cc'd on this).
Thanks,
Maxime
Le 10/05/2012 15:28, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
So I would really like to keep the non-DT probing. This will give the
ability for users to experiment IIO/ADC with whichever kernel revision,
whichever AT91 SoC they like.
Arnd, we will have to agree on a way to push this work into mainline,
but please consider keeping the non-DT part for this driver.
Ok. If the non-DT part is important to you, I suggest you merge it
all through the IIO tree, to avoid dependency problems with the
platform data header file.
Please add my Acked-by for the arch/arm patches.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
